Unemployment Rates are Higher among Women

Women's limited access to employment opportunities, particularly in the formal labour market, is reflected in the gap between women's and men's open unemployment rates. Although more men than women are openly unemployed because of their larger numbers in the labour force, women's unemployment rates tend to be higher than those of men.

Download and read the .pdf in the right-hand column in order to see examples of trends in women's unemployment:

Disadvantages in the Labour Market

In spite of women's increased participation in the labour force, basic gender based disadvantages persist.

Continued job segregation in labour markets: although women are entering the labour market in increasing numbers, their employment is concentrated in a relatively small number of "female" areas and occupations which tend to attract lower rewards and less prestige. In developing countries, the majority are engaged in agriculture, sales or service jobs. Nearly 80 per cent of economically active women in sub-Saharan Africa and at least half in Asia, except West Asia, are in agriculture. The services sector accounts for about 70 per cent of economically active women in Latin America and the Caribbean, and 40 per cent in Asia and the Pacific.

The newly industrialized and industrializing countries of South-East Asia and Latin America are an exception insofar as the industrialization process in some sectors has been female-led. A significant and growing number of women are employed in industry. Women provide up to 80 per cent of the workforce of export processing zones in South-East Asia. Women have also made steady progress in manufacturing in Latin America and the Caribbean.

In Africa, with the exception of Mauritius and Egypt, the share of manufacturing in total employment, and therefore the proportion of women in this sector relative to agriculture and services, has remained relatively low.

"Atypical" forms of employment: the trend towards flexible working patterns and practices in response to competitive pressures on the global markets has resulted in the growth of "atypical" or "non-standard" forms of work.

"Atypical" forms of work cover flexible working hours, part-time work, home work whether in traditional activities or in more advanced technologies, and casual, temporary employment arrangements. They fall outside of labour legislation, social security systems and collective agreements that were formulated to regulate formal employee-employer relationships.



Largely in low-productivity and low-quality jobs: the growth in women's employment has not been matched by the quality of the majority of jobs they have access to. Whether in the self-employed sector in rural and urban areas, or in formal wage employment in private or public sectors, a greater number of working women (than men) find themselves in the lower ranks of the profession in terms of productivity, return to labour and/or occupational status. Therefore, gender-based disadvantages prevent those who have jobs from benefiting fully from this "access" to employment. Gender inequalities are recreated through terms and conditions of employment, in other words, through a relatively lower quality of employment.
Among other factors, the search for flexible low-cost labour has encouraged industrial enterprises to resort to subcontracting with concomitant extension of home work and other forms of outwork. In both developed and developing countries women have been more affected by this trend than men. In the vast majority of cases, homeworkers are women – often with small children – who engage in these activities as much because of their family responsibilities as because of the lack of other income-earning opportunities. Mainly invisible and difficult to organize, homeworkers are particularly vulnerable to exploitation and are often excluded from the protection and benefits afforded by labour legislation


Go to previous page Go to top Go to next page